![]() The testers re-create the everyday routine of a client by visiting websites, downloading files, and installing and launching applications. The corporate solutions from Kaspersky Lab, Bitdefender, Trend Micro and Symantec achieved 5.5 to 6 points. Thus, the copying of data or executing programs was not negatively impacted. At the height of having the highest detection rate, the system load on the client remains small. The situation looks much better among the first four products in the table, which also achieved 6 points in detection. For this reason, the testers only awarded 3 and 4 points respectively out of a possible 6. The products from Cylance and Seqrite required slightly too much system performance. After all, existing workstations are normally not very heavily equipped. The performance or system load created by a product during detection on the client is a critical point, especially for corporate users. Only the solution from Seqrite was unable to surpass the reference value, achieving scores even below those of Microsoft in the percentage detection rate. The reference value from Microsoft indicated a detection rate of 93.1 and 99.6 percent this earned 4.5 points. The laboratory awarded the coveted maximum point score of 6 a total of six times. Client Security from F-Secure failed to recognize an old nemesis and thus achieved only 99.9 percent in the second phase. They identified 100 percent of the threats in both test phases. The best performers in this category were the products from Bitdefender and Symantec. ![]() ![]() ![]() In the second phase, the test with the AV-TEST reference set, the objective was to detect already known malware. ![]() The first phase, the real-world test, required the detection of zero-day malware threats from the web and from email attachments. The laboratory tested protection performance, involving just under 15,000 malware specimens in two test phases. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |